Explain how the ruling of dred scott v. sandford illustrated the differences between the political goals of the north and the south.

Answers

answer:

solve 1/4 %(4/5 * -7/8 )

The political context surrounding slavery in the years leading up to the Dred Scott decision was one of compromise and sectional tensions. With the opening of Western territories, there was heightened debate between the North and South over the issue of slavery. 
The Dred Scott Case vs Sanford was about gaining freedom. The North were trying to help so that he would gain his freedom since he was in a nonslavery state but the South fought that he was property and remained property.
North wanted slaves free south didnt and the north kinda ironicly hated blackppl just as much of the south but dred scott helped change pay and labor laws in the country
North wanted slaves free south didnt and the north kinda ironicly hated blackppl just as much of the south but dred scott change pay and labor laws in the country
Dred Scott case, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on US labor law and constitutional law. It held that "a negro, whose ancestors were imported into [the U.S.], and sold as slaves", whether enslaved or free, could not be an American citizen and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court, and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States. Dred Scott, an enslaved man of "the negro African race" who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories, attempted to sue for his freedom. In a 7–2 decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, the court denied Scott's request. The decision was only the second time that the Supreme Court had ruled an Act of Congress to be unconstitutional.

The North had decided that they wanted to free the slaves while the south did not. As we know, the North strongly Disliked colored people as did the south. Dred Scott helped make a change to labor laws in the USA.

The North and south had different views on their beliefs, and thus lead to conflict

Explanation:

The ruling of Dred Scott vs Sandford, illustrated the differences between the political goals of the North and the South explains how the two regions involved, north and south, had contrary opinions and  differences in rust.

it  helped to show that the compromise of  was Missouri  was not constitutional because all slave owners had the right to carry or move there property wherever they pleases.

It illustrated differences because it showed how the two areas, north and south, had differences in belief. it also helped to show that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional because all slave owners had the right to take there property wherever they pleased.


Do you know the answer?

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 22.06.2019, tony7135
on 6 november american voters will elect members of the house of representatives and the senate, which together are called congress. both houses of congress are currently controlle...Read More
2 more answers
History, 22.06.2019, kkatlynn
the answer is: must pay taxes on profitssince it is considered as a part of your income, profits from investments is eligible for tax payment. the tax from your investment could b...Read More
1 more answers
History, 22.06.2019, amandavertre
answer: in october 1962, an american u-2 spy plane secretly photographed nuclear missile sites being built by the soviet union on the island of cuba. president kennedy did not wan...Read More
2 more answers